EPA's analysis underlying the rule is, quote, flawed in multiple respects.

What you did is you forced it down, just like everybody else does within this agency. And so, who cares about the rules?

I come from Arizona, where water is for fighting over, whiskey is for drinking.

Just as the President has used the Department of Justice, the IRS, and the Department of Homeland Security as a political weapon, he now has expanded his arsenal to include a new tool for the EPA and his regulatory henchmen.

If we allow this to move forward, regulatory agencies will be able to cook the books to whatever manner they dream of.

The far-reaching application of this new climate change model is so broad and inaccurate that there is no telling how many jobs will be lost as the President seeks to further his far left political agenda by any and all means necessary.

It must be defined specifically in statute and policy, and then let's define the budget to go with that before the agency or the President can spend it.

No, ma'am. That's a yes or a no. You either did the due diligence or you didn't.

So you knew that there were vulnerabilities. And you are also aware, I would assume, that the Sakula malware, which has been tied to the OPM attack, had been also tied to the Anthem cyber attack.

Did it not occur to you that you needed to evaluate the vulnerabilities at DOI for a potential cyber attack from what we knew in terms of the malware that was used in the Anthem attack?

The Sonoran desert tortoise is part of a growing problem involving large settlements with the environmental groups who sue the Fish and Wildlife Service's regulatory protections with regard to a large number of different wildlife and plant…

In my home State of Arizona, a few special interest groups have been pushing the President to unilaterally designate a massive new 1.7-million-acre national monument in the Grand Canyon watershed. Twenty-six Members of Congress have joined…