With that understanding, and I have always had a good working relationship with the gentleman, if the majority will also commit to work on the PM-10 issue and to work with me to ensure that funds can be used to clean up PM-10, I would be amenable to withdrawing that amendment with the understanding that it will be worked on in conference so that we can ensure CMAQ funds can be used to clean up PM-10 materials, because that is an important issue to my constituents and, quite frankly, to all the States of the West.
John Shadegg: “With that understanding, and I have always had a good working relationship with the gentleman, if the majority will also…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the importance of addressing PM-10 pollution and funding during a legislative session.
Share
More from John Shadegg
No, we don't force people to do that. I guess we do say that if you want to drive in some places, you have to buy auto insurance to insure against damage to somebody else. Right?
Ah, so it's Republicans who oppose this bill that are the pals of the health insurance industry? I don't think so. And you're telling me that in the one State where we've already tried this, a mandate that you must buy health insurance…
It seems to me morally indefensible, morally indefensible to say to the American people, If you work for a big, big, big employer--like you and I do, the Federal Government--or like we'll say, General Motors or Intel or Motorola or AT&T or…
Wait, the gentleman's telling me that never before in Federal law have we ordered people to buy a particular product, that we don't do that in Federal law as a routine matter?





