It seems to me morally indefensible, morally indefensible to say to the American people, If you work for a big, big, big employer--like you and I do, the Federal Government--or like we'll say, General Motors or Intel or Motorola or AT&T or any of those big employers, you work for a big employer, you're a lucky guy or a lucky gal because your health insurance is tax free. Your employer buys the health insurance and writes off the cost of buying that health insurance. Your employer then gives that health insurance coverage to you, and it's not income to you. So the tax on-- we'll say, a $5,000 insurance policy--zero, zip, zero, nothing because you were lucky enough to go to work for a big employer. But the law in America--and I think this is what is morally indefensible.
Editor's note · Context
The speaker addresses the inequities in health insurance taxation between large and small employers.
Share
More from John Shadegg
I certainly think we need health care reform. I know that we believe that while the current system provides very high-quality health care, it often denies people access. But I want to talk a little bit about what's in the bill as well. The…
You just used the number of 12 million. Two professors at the University of Minnesota, which is not exactly a conservative university, said, if you just enacted cross-State-line purchases, then that would enable 12 million additional…
The gentleman started by commenting about the shutting down of the switchboards and whether or not individual citizens could get through to their Member of Congress today and express their feelings, and I would suggest right now maybe…
Your idea is we should empower patients to be able to pick their plans and to be able to pick their doctors, which we could do by, number one, letting those Americans who can afford it but who don't get employer-provided care buy health…





