I think one of the keys that the gentleman just mentioned is we often talk about choice in the abstract. It is important, I think, for people to understand that not only under the Clinton-Gore plan do you make one choice at the outset, you either opt in or opt out and that decision is binding for life, but the second point is...if you choose to participate in the plan which the Clinton-Gore team is proposing, you are, in fact, giving away your choice, your right to choose the drug that is best for you, to a Federal bureaucrat. I know many people that work as government employees...but under the Gore plan the schedule of committed drugs would be decided by someone deep in the bowels of the Federal bureaucracy.
John Shadegg: “I think one of the keys that the gentleman just mentioned is we often talk about choice in the abstract. It is…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of the Clinton-Gore health care plan on senior citizens' choices.
Share
More from John Shadegg
So this would be the first Federal mandate saying you must buy a product because the Federal Government tells you you must buy a product?
Oh, the cost went up. Wait, the cost went up? They have forced everybody in Massachusetts, like this bill would do, to buy a health insurance plan on the premise that the cost would go down. But in Massachusetts where they did it, the cost…
It seems to me morally indefensible, morally indefensible to say to the American people, If you work for a big, big, big employer--like you and I do, the Federal Government--or like we'll say, General Motors or Intel or Motorola or AT&T or…
I kind of think the American people are fairly bright. I think they see through this. If you are deeming a bill passed in a rule, aren't you actually passing that bill and aren't you voting for that bill? And isn't this just a trick or a…





