I would point out that this still allows these monies to be spent. It requires a straightforward certification that these conditions are met before those monies can be spent. And it is a straightforward attempt to make sure that we protect Social Security, we do not raid it; we protect Medicare, we do not raid it; and, we stay on the commitment of this Congress to pay down the debt, the publicly held debt, by 2013. It is a straightforward and honest amendment that says conservation funding is still important and it ought to occur, but not at the expense of Social Security, not at the expense of Medicare, not at the expense of paying down our debt.
John Shadegg: “I would point out that this still allows these monies to be spent. It requires a straightforward certification that…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the importance of protecting Social Security and Medicare while addressing conservation funding.
Share
More from John Shadegg
So AARP likes it and PhRMA, which are big drug companies, like it. All of the big insurance companies like it because you're mandated to buy their product. And there is no public option competing with them, and they don't have to compete…
As I understand it, we first talked about a Republican idea of saying let everyone buy health insurance tax free. Republican idea. That would take care of the little guy who's paying an outrageous after-tax price for his health care. One…
I think they have failed to provide economic coverage to the American people. I think they have failed to hold down costs. I think that the health insurance industry is largely to blame for a system that wastes a ton of money; yet it's the…
So this would be the first Federal mandate saying you must buy a product because the Federal Government tells you you must buy a product?





