I just will close on this one, saying again this is one of many museums that we are funding here. We simply can't fund them all. At some point it would be nice to give the taxpayers a gift and actually say we're not going to fund a particular earmark. We did it a couple of weeks ago. This is not an idle process. We've had one occasion already where I've come to offer an earmark, and the sponsor of the earmark beat me to the floor and offered an amendment to revoke his own earmark. So obviously there needed to be more vetting of that earmark. I would assume that there are others like it. So this is a process we should go through. I would urge support of the amendment. Mr. Chairman, I yield back.
Jeff Flake: “I just will close on this one, saying again this is one of many museums that we are funding here. We simply can't fund…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the funding of museums and the process of vetting earmarks.
Share
More from Jeff Flake
I will. I was pleased to see after the December visit by Erdogan to Cyprus that the United States Government spoke out, as did the U.N., that any of the action that was contemplated with Varosha, for example, would violate Security Council…
I ask unanimous consent that the Senate proceed to immediate consideration of Calendar No. 393, S. 2644. I further ask that the committee-reported substitute amendment be agreed to, the bill, as amended, be considered read a third time and…
I expect we will stay in regular touch, and I look forward to finding ways that we can continue to work together on making sure that the United States remains not just a nation of interests, but a nation of values and where our foreign…
We need to make clear that that is inconsistent with democratic values and inconsistent with commitments that have been made.





