to end this debate tonight on these earmarks, I would just say that there has not been one earmark that has been challenged here tonight that isn't going to a valuable organization as far as I'm concerned. The question is not is there value in that organization or is there value in what this aquarium or what this historic site is doing. The question is should we be paying for it at the Federal level. And I think that's what taxpayers have a hard time with, and I think they should, particularly given the fiscal problems that we're having at the Federal level.
Jeff Flake: “to end this debate tonight on these earmarks, I would just say that there has not been one earmark that has been…”
On the recordJuly 18, 2007
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing the issue of federal funding for earmarks during a debate.
Share
More from Jeff Flake
Dec 13, 2018
I wish to begin by noting that had the people of Arizona and America been truly lucky, my mother or father would have served in the U.S. House of Representatives and in the Senate. Everything I know about what matters most in life I…
Jul 26, 2021
I will. As I mentioned in the statement, they need to know that any purchase of additional Russian weapons will result in additional CAATSA sanctions.
Sep 30, 2020
the alarm among Republicans in the Senate privately is palpable. They feel the President may be able to navigate issues like the peaceful transfer of power, Proud Boys, white supremacy, and somehow through relentlessness and shamelessness…





