The hundred percent expensing, which we believe may, at least in the text from single biggest driver of economic expansion is a timing effect.
David Schweikert
The Public Record
David Schweikert is an American politician serving as the U.S. Representative for Arizona's 1st congressional district since 2011. A member of the Republican Party, he has focused on issues such as fiscal responsibility and economic growth during his tenure in Congress. Schweikert has been involved in various legislative efforts aimed at reducing the national debt and promoting job creation in Arizona. He has also served on several committees, contributing to discussions on budgetary matters and financial services.
I need the next--you know, the folks who venture to bring in the next generation of talent.
Thank you, Mr. Chairman, and Mr. Chairman and Ranking Member Moore. We all get titles.
My fear is, as a committee, we are not telling each other the truth of the scale of the borrowing stress.
I actually am about to try to make everyone mad. I actually believe data is a private property right. It belongs to you as an American citizen. The problem with our design here, it is really well-meaning, but it doesn't get at the…
It is our own policies that are the barrier to the adoption of these technologies.
We are borrowing, what, $95,000 a second, and almost every dime of the growth of that spending is interest and health care costs.
If you actually had a supportive Federal Government, or one that just got the hell out of the way, what are you capable of?
It has taken us again and again right to the brink of shutting down the government.
What you are doing is very important because those of us on Ways and Means are trying to find a way to do a tax hearing in Indian Country.
What is unique about President Harvier and his leadership is the Salt River Pima Maricopa is actually very sophisticated.
I wish we could just get to a situation of is this a program, is this an agency that runs in the best interest of the people who fund it and the same people who fund everything else in our government?
That adoption of technology should dramatically change your structural cost of collections.
And, while there is all kind of different figures floating around about what it has cost, I would just caution people to say, you know, any time we say it costs the government, we keep in mind that it actually then gave taxpayers a break…
I have got to tell you, from a standpoint of formerly being in the private sector, and have--while I was present, I was not in the operation at the time of going through the early days of the pandemic.
I have a fixation that the adoption of technology is the ultimate solution here.
However, we continue to look at programs and we tend to look at hold-ups in it.
Maybe we need to really think about this co-op model, these new manufacturing methods, and the ability to do it better, faster, cheaper.
We, right now, as a government, we give $16 billion a year to Big Pharma to buy down the price of insulin.
This is sort of elementary school economics. A dozen things have been said here that are absolutely wrong. Mr. Speaker, if you look at the 2017 tax reform, where did we get the greatest economic boost with the least amount of cost? It was…





