Are we opening a Pandora's Box where we are actually--since we are getting rid of this connection that we are actually going to allow a court to interpret what Congress has done?
Ben Quayle: “Are we opening a Pandora's Box where we are actually--since we are getting rid of this connection that we are actually…”
Editor's note · Context
Quayle raises concerns about potential regulatory overreach by states.
Share
More from Ben Quayle
So it says that basically the precedent would be set that the President, if you follow this reasoning, could make recess appointments when the Senate gavels out.
So were the funds not necessary--did--are we overly funding these programs? Because it seems like we are actually extending and expanding what they are supposed to be doing by putting this additional money into new programs.
The Supreme Court rejected that argument in the Crawford case, and indeed the Court said that a voter identification requirement is not a poll tax...
Our country's deficit is projected to exceed $1 trillion for the fourth straight year, and our gross national debt exceeds $15 trillion.





