We should not tax the very people who need their money the most, my generation, to transfer that to the wealthy.

the Social Security 2100 Act is more than 100 percent tax increases.

I would favor having retirees bear a larger share of everyday costs in return for greater protection against the worst health cost outcomes.

What we are effectively doing is we are transferring wealth from the young to the old.

Generationally, this is shifting more of the costs to future generations.

Not necessarily less in dollar terms, but less than they are currently promised.

But it was not created to be paying $40,000 a year to somebody who made 130 every year of his life.

I favor the--Terri Sewell's approach, which is a regional minimum wage.

This is deeply unfair, and it is bad for economic growth.

However, invoking privilege preventing access to documents should be done sparingly and err on the side of transparency.

Does it make sense for the wealthiest among us to have an increase in benefits after they have had their entire lives to save?

This is, by far, the biggest threat to retirement security, and should be addressed as promptly as possible.