Those characteristics would seem to point at least as strongly in favor of a fixed price contract as they would cost-plus.

The current budget request has rhetorically acknowledged an increase of worldwide threats.

We can expect 18 aircraft on August 2017?

What would necessitate a sole source contract for a helicopter?

The President's defense budget request for this fiscal year is disappointing.

What bearing does that particular characteristic have on the decision that should ultimately hinge on best value to the taxpayer?

Let us return to today's aircraft, specifically fourth generation fighter aircraft.

Given the programs you described, if successful, when might we actually see vehicles commanded by the next generation of H.R. McMasters downrange in Eastern Europe and Middle East with these systems?

I think, as we have discussed, as Senator Ernst raised in her questions, this fits in with the theme of modernization and readiness.

Thank you very much for a productive conversation. Most importantly, thanks for your service to our country.

to build upon Senator Sullivan's comments about 450,000 being an unacceptable risk in terms of end strength, there are some ideas in this Congress to mandate a higher level than that, say 480, 490, what have you.