The Federal Government would not examine how this broad designation could cost the people and businesses of my district the loss of the use of their land, the loss of their jobs, or the very real threat of new, burdensome, and unexpected regulatory costs.
Rick Crawford: “The Federal Government would not examine how this broad designation could cost the people and businesses of my district…”
On the recordMay 13, 2014
Source
congress.govEditor's note · Context
Crawford highlights the potential negative impacts of habitat designation on local communities.
Share
More from Rick Crawford
Jul 23, 2024
Since President Biden took office, we've heard frequently from stakeholders spanning all regions and industries about the burden of this administration's onerous regulatory agenda.
Jul 23, 2024
The Federal Highway Administration continues to pursue its final rule to force a greenhouse gas performance measure on state departments of transportation and metropolitan planning organizations, despite lacking the statutory authority to…
Jun 11, 2026
Once this authorization expires, the clock starts ticking. The implications get worse every single day.





