I think one thing missing in this discussion is what the American people want. I am here to say, at least from my standpoint, what I think they might be saying to us. First, that these Members of Congress are sitting up there and distinguishing between this and that and the Attorney General and the prosecutor and legal matters and criminal matters, when all they are trying to do is to have special treatment for special people. I think we have a problem with the American people in that we have a very powerful Member or Members who might be involved in this. That divides us from them, in their minds, and I think the only thing that we have to do is say 'What do the people at the ground level want?' And discuss that. All of these other arguments are filled with persuasion and they make sense when you look at it from up here and we sit and we talk back and forth, and we can talk about malted milk and other things and jurisdiction and so forth, but the American people need to be heard, and we need to let them be heard with this vote so that we can have this investigation and show them that they are a part of this process.
Jay Dickey: “I think one thing missing in this discussion is what the American people want. I am here to say, at least from my…”
Editor's note · Context
Addressing the need to consider the American people's views in congressional discussions.
Share
More from Jay Dickey
I have four children. All of them are boys, except for two. It is ``except for two'' that bothers me now, even though they are of age. They are grown. Laura and Rachel are very fine, well-adjusted kids, and I am thankful for this. Their…
I would like to say I am on this subcommittee of the Committee on Appropriations, and this issue did not come up for discussion. We have in our laws the provision that no Federal funding will be made available for abortions, time and time…
Would that provision in this bill direct the Corps to use the funds provided in fiscal year 1997 to begin construction of a diversion channel, or at least to begin moving dirt?
I want to confine my remarks to the Tate-Riggs bill. It has to do with the pensions that are available to Members of Congress who have been convicted of felonies. I had someone in Arkansas come up to me and say, let me get this thing…





