this is an old formula to identify a problem and then you create a new Federal program that might solve it. There is a problem. There is a problem with after-school care. The solution is not to create yet another Federal program. We already have four existing programs that allow for after-school care. One of the problems with this amendment, or this program, would be that it would be school-based, school-run, and, therefore, prohibit scores of organizations like the YMCA that are currently providing for after-school care. They would be excluded entirely. There are 19 existing Federal programs that provide tutoring and mentoring for students on a one-on-one basis. So it is simply unnecessary to start a new Federal program at a price tag of $250 million. I ask my colleagues to oppose this amendment.
Asa Hutchinson: “this is an old formula to identify a problem and then you create a new Federal program that might solve it. There is a…”
On the recordApril 23, 1998
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Opposing a proposed amendment related to after-school care funding.
Share
More from Asa Hutchinson
May 6, 2023
The Court needs to be transparent, first of all. They need to be clear on what their reporting rules are.
Jul 18, 2023
I’ve said repeatedly that when it comes to January 6, and the attack on the Capitol, Donald Trump is morally responsible.
Jun 25, 2022
But at the state level, this became baked in with redistricting. And more and more states now have Republican legislatures who will ban or restrict abortions if governors or state officials are not there to veto it.
Dec 17, 2022
January 6th was a serious affront to our democracy, and we have to treat that seriously. And we can't defend what happened on that day. And we stand up for the Constitution.





