It could be a national security cost plus a physical cost, could it not?

Your job is also to follow the law.

If a drug is overpriced, it is not accessible to a consumer.

Aggregate credit availability has been increasing recently, as you said.

Your job is also to follow the law, is it not?

After last year's significant increase in the National Institutes of Health, it's time to again make research funding a national priority.

If you cannot find one egregious example where you can apply this, I would be surprised.

The National Cancer Moonshot Initiative is an important opportunity to speed progress on childhood cancers.

I believe strongly in the promise of medical research and what that medical research does for individuals and families and the economy and taxpayers.

By 2050, according to figures from NIH, the cost to treat and care for those suffering from just Alzheimer's alone is anticipated to be $1.1 trillion of today's dollars.

It's a risky decision. It's a decision that I don't support and hope that at the end of this process our committee will not look at what the administration has asked for, but look at what we would hope to be able to do.

If everything is a priority, nothing is a priority, and the hard work of this committee, with really lots of talent on both sides of the aisle, is to figure out what we can do about those priorities.