I think by now everybody knows it would allow small businesses, the smallest of the small, grossing less than $500,000, the opportunity to continue to pay the minimum wage at $4.25. Businesses grossing above $500,000 would begin paying $4.75 on January 1, 1997, and $5.15 on January 1, 1998. Without this provision, this would be a retroactive minimum wage increase. As the Senator from Texas has already pointed out, it means that businesses who have laid out their plans, issued price lists, or bid on contracts will find that somebody is going around and reaching into their pockets and pulling out money that might not be there. Without the delayed effective date, it is possible that small businesses or a business of any size might find themselves working under existing arrangements, contracts, price lists, for a loss if we do the unheard of step of imposing a retroactive minimum wage. That alone, I think, mandates the passage of this amendment. In addition, we provide a training wage.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing an amendment related to minimum wage provisions for small businesses.
Share
More from Julian Bond
Any time a group of people are denied rights and struggle for their rights, that's a civil rights movement.
Gay and lesbian rights are not special rights in any way. It isn't 'special' to be free from discrimination. It is an ordinary, universal entitlement of citizenship.
Let me explain briefly that we added one sentence to a two-sentence amendment saying, in essence, that it will not affect the GSEs, existing affordable housing programs. Those are programs already in effect. There was some question about…
our families are struggling in the worst economy since the Great Depression. It is a difficult time for many who do not have jobs or who have seen their savings shrink or are in danger of losing their homes. We are working very hard on…





