I do not think we need to say more about this. It is very clear that the scientific community says we need it. We can find out things on monkeys operating under the legal and ethical standards that we cannot find out when we send humans into space, and we are far better testing on monkeys under the ethical standards that are imposed what the impacts of weightlessness is. I cannot understand all of the scientific jargon in the letters. But I can read the headlines. And the headlines from these letters are from the scientific community supported by the Association of American Universities, the Land-Grant Colleges, and the Association of American Medical Colleges which say that we need this information. Are we to substitute our scientific judgment for theirs? I happen to think personally that would be the height of arrogance to say that we know more about science than the professionals, the great leading scientific minds and institutions of higher education around the country. That is why I hope, Mr. President, that an overwhelming bipartisan majority of this body will join me in rejecting the motion to table.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the importance of scientific research involving monkeys in space studies.
Share
More from Julian Bond
to begin, I think I should make some general comments about my concern and about my ability to work with the distinguished chairman of the committee on affordable housing programs. We have worked a long time on these programs together, and…
these last few days, I have been traveling across my State of Missouri, and to say that people are outraged over this $1 trillion budget buster would be an understatement. Unfortunately, many of the people have called the office and talked…
Gay and lesbian rights are not special rights in any way. It isn't 'special' to be free from discrimination. It is an ordinary, universal entitlement of citizenship.





