I applaud and support the Senator's premise that we ought to make sure the registration the first time is legitimate because that is where the problem begins. Does he understand that existing motor voter law does not permit effective ascertainment of the legitimacy of a registration upon registration, No. 1? And, No. 2, that the bill before us would not apply to anybody who is already registered? We had set up these requirements. Is the Senator aware we set up these requirements only for people registering after the date of the act, and they only have to meet the requirements to prove they are a live, qualified human being, one time--either upon registration or upon the first vote? Is the Senator aware of those two things?
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the legitimacy of voter registration and the implications of existing motor voter law.
Share
More from Julian Bond
I rise to speak about TARP. The President has submitted the request for the second half of the funds. This is not an easy decision for Members of Congress. We have lots of questions about how the first $350 billion was spent. Questions…
We ought to be happy that other people, including gays and lesbians, and many other people have imitated the black movement for human rights.
I dispute his statement that there were 6 years of unlawful activity of the President. He said no court will be able to review the illegality; no independent officials have reviewed it. First, it is my understanding, although I was not one…
Well, I think it is. I mean any time a group of people are denied rights and struggle for their rights, that's a civil rights movement.





