I always enjoy a discussion with our colleague and neighbor from the State of Oklahoma. His comments that earmarks have caused bridge deficiencies and tragedies is a bridge too far. I believe as well-intentioned as this amendment is, it fails to understand how the States go about rehabilitating their bridges and maintaining the bridges in their States. There are many points I can make about this amendment, but I think it is important to note that according to the conditions and needs report of the Department of Transportation in 2006, we need to invest approximately $12.4 billion annually to eliminate the existing backlog and correct other deficiencies, and we are currently spending over $10 billion a year. As Secretary Mary Peters said in testimony on September 5 before the House Transportation Committee, the number of structurally deficient bridges has been declining significantly from 18.7 percent in 1994 to 12.0 percent now. Obviously, that is still too much, but it is not just deficient bridges. As I pointed out yesterday, we have tremendous highway safety needs.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing bridge safety and funding during a debate on transportation issues.
Share
More from Julian Bond
I don't think so. I think this -- and African-American communities like every other community in the country, the tide is shifting.
Julian Bond at one point, we said, should younger people be passed the baton of leadership or have to snatch it? And he said, unabashedly, snatch it.
A couple of months ago, we passed a good bill to say we would authorize $10 million for State housing finance agencies to help refinance homes where the owners were facing foreclosure. A good approach. This is a disastrous approach. CBO…
All Americans ought to enjoy civil rights, and whatever the court does today, we are going to move a step closer to everyone enjoying these rights.





