Mr. President, we began consideration of this bill on December 17, the FISA Amendments Act of 2007. As my friend the chairman said, it was passed by the Senate Intelligence Committee with overwhelming bipartisan support. It has garnered the support of the Director of National Intelligence, and I believe it is the way forward. I was a bit amused to hear my friend say that the FISA bill was being taken hostage; they were scoring political points. I haven't heard from the White House anything other than they want to have this bill passed. We have sought to protect the rights of Republican Members on the minority side. We have suggested that this bill is so controversial, as all intelligence bills are, that amendments be subjected to a 60-vote majority. The simple fact is, we could pass perhaps a number of amendments that could destroy the structure of the bill we have presented and put us in the position where it would not get the 60 votes needed to pass. My suggestion is that we move forward accepting some amendments.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the FISA Amendments Act of 2007 and the need for bipartisan support and amendment procedures.
Share
More from Julian Bond
All Americans ought to enjoy civil rights, and whatever the court does today, we are going to move a step closer to everyone enjoying these rights.
Let me explain briefly that we added one sentence to a two-sentence amendment saying, in essence, that it will not affect the GSEs, existing affordable housing programs. Those are programs already in effect. There was some question about…
I rise to introduce the Limitations on Interrogation Techniques Act of 2009. This bill is identical to one I introduced last summer, along with Senators Hatch, Chambliss, Burr, and Warner. Last week, my colleague and good friend on the…





