I commend our House colleagues for continuing the tradition of bipartisan work on the farm bill, for soliciting broad input, for finishing the bill early this year, for not pitting farmers against farmers and one region against another, processors against farmers and environmentalists against farmers. In my view, the House did succeed in avoiding the temptation to politicize farm policy, and I believe the product they have reached in conference with the Senate is good for all agriculture. The staff worked long days, nights and weekends, as did, of course, the conferees. It is not very often that we do anything around here ahead of time. For that, the conferees deserve special recognition. Clearly, there are many provisions in the bill that I support. There are some issues on which each of us would have a much different take, we would have handled differently, if not burdened by the natural constraints of a democracy. I know that some Senators are making a strongly held case that this legislation costs too much. I have my own misgivings about the price of farm policy.
On the recordMay 8, 2002
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing the bipartisan efforts in crafting the farm bill during Senate floor debate.
Share
More from Julian Bond
Mar 28, 2012
Absolutely. Absolutely. As more and more people think, 'Gee, that guy who sits next to me in church, he's gay, and he seems to be OK.'
Mar 28, 2012
I can only go by what I read in the papers or see on TV, that what seemed to happen is this police wannabe followed him, against the orders of the police, got out of his car, confronted him in some way. We don't know what happened then…
Jun 19, 2008
This final amendment limits the responsibility of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac for housing entities that receive funding from the Affordable Housing Trust Fund created under the bill. The amendment prohibits the trust fund to be used for…





