I have had numerous discussions with the Senator from California. Obviously, we see these issues very differently. Let me point out to my colleagues, this is not something that has just come up. When we had the committee markup of this bill, the Senator and I had an opportunity to debate it at that point. An amendment, not modified, such as the one I presented on the floor last week, was kept in the bill. Her motion to strike failed 17 to 12. After that time, we met with the Senator from California and other concerned Senators to make sure we did not do the things that the current California Air Resources Board regulation would do; that is, cost 22,000 American jobs and put at risk of fire, burn, and explosion people using small engines, whether they be in a lawnmower, a leaf blower, a weed eater, or a chain saw. These were the real problems in the California Air Regulation Board proposal.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of California Air Resources Board regulations on small engines and job loss.
Share
More from Julian Bond
Let me explain briefly that we added one sentence to a two-sentence amendment saying, in essence, that it will not affect the GSEs, existing affordable housing programs. Those are programs already in effect. There was some question about…
Full equality means enjoying all of the rights that everybody else in the country enjoys. If everybody else in the country enjoys rights one, two, three and four, you have got to enjoy those rights too.
to begin, I think I should make some general comments about my concern and about my ability to work with the distinguished chairman of the committee on affordable housing programs. We have worked a long time on these programs together, and…
our families are struggling in the worst economy since the Great Depression. It is a difficult time for many who do not have jobs or who have seen their savings shrink or are in danger of losing their homes. We are working very hard on…





