Oral arguments often give very little insight into how that opinion would come out, and sometimes judges change their minds from the oral argument date to the time they write an opinion.
Jeff Sessions
The Public Record
Jeff Sessions is an American politician and lawyer who served as the 84th Attorney General of the United States from 2017 to 2018. A member of the Republican Party, he was previously a U.S. Senator from Alabama from 2007 to 2017. During his tenure in the Senate, Sessions was known for his strong stance on immigration and law enforcement issues, advocating for stricter immigration policies and supporting various measures to combat drug trafficking and crime. He also served as the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Alabama from 2001 to 2002.
Madam Chair, could I offer a letter from former Senator Bob Kerrey in opposition to the legislation?
the greatest likelihood of apprehending serious criminals, people who actually commit crimes and murders, based on my 15-plus years of prosecuting
one of the greatest advancements in criminal justice is the ability to arrest someone in New York who was convicted of a felony in Alabama
What I am hearing is that while claiming to arrest more criminal aliens, internal ICE documents show that DHS leadership has ordered field officers not to arrest fugitives and re-entries.
It is a criminal offense to enter the United States illegally. It is not a civil matter.
I am confident--I think the officers feel like you have spent more time talking with the activist groups than the officers themselves and drafting guidelines that help them do their job.
We disagree on some things here, but the Chairman is sincerely committed to making us a healthy and more viable place, and I am, too.
Solyndra, $530 million, we are not going to have any more jobs there, it looks like, filed for bankruptcy.
Spain has acknowledged their error and have backed away from much of what they have been doing.
We have had an world experiment in Spain. They have been one of the most ambitious countries in the world in trying to create jobs by creating a green energy program.
The greatest threat to the Court, in my opinion, is if the American people believe that judges are consistently redefining the meaning of words to advance their agenda.
I do think we have a range in which if you believe they are too flexible about interpreting the Constitution, then I would conclude they are not faithful to the Constitution and, therefore, I could not support them.
Any judge that says the U.S. Constitution calls for the elimination of the death penalty really should not be on the bench.
I believe this will be a healthy hearing, and will deal with the tension of a desire to utilize local people...





