While the removal of tactical nuclear weapons from Europe is ultimately the President's decision, the administration has committed to addressing these issues within the framework of the NATO alliance, not unilaterally.

has the U.S. Government examined the feasibility of verifying Russian compliance with an agreement to reduce tactical nuclear weapons?

Nuclear weapons weren't obsolete, they do play a role in the world today that cannot be wished away.

I think it would be a mistake, as we spend large amounts of money developing our systems, if we do not give sufficient attention to security.

I think that's a positive step.

The DDPR concluded that the 'alliance's nuclear force posture currently meets the criteria for an effective deterrence and defence posture.'

Admiral Syring, will you examine the feasibility of placing more than one kill vehicle atop the GBI?

The ORS concept--for a second year in a row, the budget request proposes a termination of the congressionally-established ORS Office.

I was disappointed and concerned about the Secretary of Defense.

I think a case can be made that nuclear weapons are a force for good, but if we allow North Korea to have them and Iran to have them...

Secretary Creedon, do you intend to address the disparity in tactical nuclear weapons that was noted in the New START Resolution of Ratification?

I really want to be clear about it. Modular and that kind of thing-- modernizing effectively our nuclear weapons arsenal is essential.

Admiral Syring, is there funding in the fiscal year 2014 request for this new kill vehicle?

the 10-year costs for U.S. nuclear delivery systems were approximately $119 billion, not including funding for a new bomber and a new ICBM.

We're now $1.4 billion, 34 percent, below that promised target at the rate we're going.

Managing capability development and acquisitions over the next 5 years will define for decades perhaps how space will either enable our warfighting capability or limit our warfighting capability.

Is the administration also concerned that Iran could pose a direct threat to the United States?

how can we effectively verify tactical nuclear weapons on the Russian side?

I would argue from the senior military side to this, they see that the strength of our Nation rides on the strength of its economy.

Secretary Creedon, do you agree that we must address any potential Russian violations before proceeding with yet another arms reduction agreement?

Given the Government-wide costs to relocate, there has been an estimate as high as $18 billion?

Secretary Creedon, can you tell me how you intend to verify compliance with a treaty that addresses tactical nuclear weapons?

I am concerned that the President's budget does not identify the impacts of the sequester in the fiscal year 2014 budget.

It's a matter of great strategic importance.

Can you tell me whether you think this approach is promising?