I was speaking of the GAO report. I do not have it before me. But as I recall the GAO report indicated that the provisions of the bill--maybe it was a predecessor of it--in their judgment would not reduce transactions costs, and that one of the reasons was they felt it could possibly increase it was because of the alternate dispute resolution methods that were there--increasing it another hearing as well as the provisions dealing with bifurcation, separate hearings that you would have to go through--thereby bringing about additional lawyer's fees in regards to those proceedings, particularly on the defendant's side where there is an hour billable approach.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the GAO report's implications on a bill's impact on transaction costs and legal fees.
Share
More from Howell Heflin
I rise in disagreement with the Senator from Pennsylvania. I do not want to prolong this, so I will make a brief statement. I assume the distinguished Senator from Pennsylvania was speaking of the amendment he had at the desk, No. 4962…
my friend Nina Reeves will soon be retiring from her position as youth director of the North Alabama Conference of the United Methodist Church after nearly 50 years. She will be leaving her post in August 1996 after the conference's…
several of us in the U.S. Senate, as well as some in the House of Representatives, have had the pleasure over the years of knowing and working with the Right Honorable Michael Jopling, a British Member of Parliament and former Minister of…
we were deeply saddened recently by the death of one of Alabama's most distinguished jurists, former Judge Joseph Phelps. He had only retired in January 1995 after serving as Montgomery County Circuit Judge for 18 years. During his long…





