What the gentleman says is correct. The United States should react as it deals with world situations through organized bodies, such as the United Nations. However, even as late as one and a half months ago, the United States indicated if Saddam Hussein did not allow the inspectors to come in, it would not wait on any United Nations resolution or any other body. It would take it on its own to intervene. We did that in Korea. We did not wait on the United Nations. We got involved. We did it in Vietnam. We did not wait on the United Nations. We got involved. When it is in the interest of this country or when the powers to be at the State Department and at the very top decide that they are going to do something, they do not wait on the world body. What you say ought to be the case, that should be our policy, but in actuality it is not our policy.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing U.S. intervention policy and the role of the United Nations.
Share
More from Earl F. Hilliard
Wonderful. Madam Speaker, I rise tonight to offer my thoughts on Black History Month which is observed every year during the month of February. I stand here humble to the reality that many African Americans sacrificed their pride, their…
When I was in the Alabama House of Representatives, somewhere in the late 1970's, somewhere around 1978, 1979. Let me say this, that is very important because as we find our suburban areas expanding, in many instances shopping centers are…
But he received that, which meant that, theoretically, he was supposed to pay taxes on that for the year 1997.
this may have been a civil war. But it was also a civil war in Bosnia. And the European countries got involved, and this country got involved; and we have had troops there, and we still have got troops there.





