Mr. President, I rise to join my friend from Oklahoma to talk about a commonsense piece of legislation. I come to the floor pretty often to talk about the deficit, and I wish to talk about something very specific we can do to address this matter. The Orphaned Earmarks Act would rescind earmarks that remain 90 percent or more unused 9 years after being appropriated. In early January, USA Today published an article examining 20 years of earmarks that have not been spent. According to the analysis: ``In at least 3,649 of those earmarks, not a single dollar had gone toward its intended purpose'' and ``Many of the orphan earmarks also count against a state's share of federal highway funds and have taken billions of dollars away from state transportation departments across the nation.'' During the past 20 years, orphan earmarks reduced the amount of money States would have received in Federal highway funding by almost $7.5 billion. That is $7.5 billion that States could have used to replace obsolete bridges, repair aging roads, and bring jobs to rural areas. As all of us know, when lawmakers earmark money, even if it is never spent for pet highway projects, that money still reduces what States receive from the Federal Government. In my own State of Alaska, $187 million in funding was lost out in the past 20 years because of orphaned earmarks. I know some of my colleagues are concerned about States losing out on money we all could use, especially these days, but let's not worry.…
Share & report
More from Mark Begich
And they have passed their budget too. So we have two budgets ready to go to conference; is that fair?
I ask unanimous consent the concurrent resolution be agreed to, and the motion to reconsider be laid upon the table, with no intervening action or debate. The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered. The concurrent…
Mr. President, if the Senator will stay on the floor for a moment, one of the bills mentioned by the Senator from Illinois was the helium bill. Within that there is an important Alaska priority. I know my colleagues worked with the…
I ask unanimous consent the resolution be agreed to, the preamble be agreed to, and the motions to reconsider be laid upon the table, with no intervening action or debate. The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered. The…





