I commend my friend from Alaska for his excellent amendment. It is about priorities, about setting priorities. I heard the Senator from Alaska point out the minuscule percentage of Americans who choose to participate in this checkoff, and I commend the Senator from Alaska. He is right on the mark. As a matter of fact, this is one of the few issues--some would argue the only issue--in America where we have a total and complete annual poll. Every April 15, American citizens get to decide whether they want to spend a dollar of taxes they already owe--that they already owe--to this fund. And the participation, as my friend pointed out, has dropped from 26 to 17 percent.
Editor's note · Context
The speaker discusses the importance of prioritizing taxpayer participation in a specific fund.
Share
More from Frank Murkowski
wilderness is another measure which has lost any sense of judgment. It is now only a function, again, of acreage, and it is a function of press releases in the media. We do not worry about whether there is any ``wilderness'' character at…
I was prepared to offer an amendment concerning private property rights relative to the application of S. 21 and what it does and how it threatens private property. However, with regard to S. 21, the California Desert Protection Act, there…
in Alaska, the problem is clear. Residents of rural villages in Alaska do not have either adequate drinking water or human sanitation facilities in their homes and communities. As a result, sickness and disease, comparable to many Third…
on March 9, the majority leader stated that those Republicans, like myself, who want Congress to conduct hearings into the Whitewater matter, are engaging only ``in partisan politics at its worst,'' and that such hearings risk ``fatal…





