This is what bothers the Senator from Alaska. Why would not the RTC want to simply extend the tolling agreement so that they could pursue the civil action and not run the risk of having the statute of limitations expire on February 28? I mean, I do not understand why, since they have evidently done it as a matter of course, they would not do it in the case of Madison.
Senator Murkowski is questioning the RTC's decision regarding the tolling agreement and its implications for civil action.
Share
More from Frank Murkowski
no program of true Federal-private partnership has been more successful than the National Park Service Concession Program. Needed visitor facilities and services have been placed in national parks at a minimum of cost to the taxpayer. The…
I think it is quite appropriate that we go all the way and address the concerns that we all anguish about. And one of them, of course, is the continued contributions of political action committees and the influence of lobbyists, as well…
Well, how could one object and suggest that activities by a special committee would somehow distract from the special counsel's obligation when, as we have discussed, we have had both committee hearings and special counsel under Watergate…
wilderness is another measure which has lost any sense of judgment. It is now only a function, again, of acreage, and it is a function of press releases in the media. We do not worry about whether there is any ``wilderness'' character at…
Other voices in this conversation
