Today, however, I am not entirely happy to be introducing a bill which, in my view, should not be necessary. Unfortunately, the failure of one Federal agency, the Department of Veterans Affairs [VA], to perceive accurately the clear intent of the Congress when it enacted amendments to the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act [ANCSA] in 1987 makes this bill, which is purely technical and which seeks only to put into practical affect congressional intent as expressed in ANCSA, necessary.
Frank Murkowski: “Today, however, I am not entirely happy to be introducing a bill which, in my view, should not be necessary.…”
Editor's note · Context
Introducing a bill related to the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act due to issues with the Department of Veterans Affairs.
Share
More from Frank Murkowski
The question is, I do not know whether the floor manager was invited to the dinner that the Senator from Maine has gone to, but the Senator from Alaska was invited to that dinner and, in the interest of full disclosure, rejected the…
I would ask my good friend from New Jersey, since he obviously is an expert and has attended the Jake Garn ski event on many occasions, why it took him so long to find out it was not a worthwhile event?
Finally, Mr. President, does the inclusion of authority to furnish delivery services in title 38 provide new authority for abortion procedures in VA hospitals?
Well, how could one object and suggest that activities by a special committee would somehow distract from the special counsel's obligation when, as we have discussed, we have had both committee hearings and special counsel under Watergate…





