At our summit on Thursday, there were a number of good ideas about reducing health care costs that the President seemed to share with Republican Members who were there. There was some obvious irritation on the part of the majority leader and others when we said things such as there is $1/2 trillion worth of cuts in Medicare, which there are. Our real objection to it is that the cuts are not used to save Medicare, which is going broke, but spent on a new program-- $1/2 trillion in new taxes. There is $1/2 trillion in new taxes. As I have just said, they tend to increase premiums for millions of Americans. There are premium increases. There is a deficit increase. It is true the CBO has said that what was presented to them didn't increase the deficit, but what was not included in what was presented was paying doctors to serve patients in the government program we call Medicare. That is like having a horse race without the horses. How are you going to have a comprehensive health care bill and not include within its costs paying doctors to serve patients in the government program? When you put it in, the deficit goes up. Then there is a problem of the passing off to States these expanded Medicaid costs without paying for them. I know as a former Governor-- and I see the former Governor of Virginia in the chair--I struggled with that every single year. All the Governors are today in both parties. They don't want us sending them a bill for expanded health care.
Editor's note · Context
The speaker addresses concerns about health care costs, Medicare cuts, and the impact on states.
Share
More from Heidi Alexander
I ask unanimous consent that notwithstanding rule XXII, all postcloture time on the Kirsch nomination expire at 5 p.m. today; further, that if confirmed, the motion to reconsider be considered made and laid upon the table and the President…
I want to speak for a few minutes about the changes to telehealth during the last five months--one of the most dramatic developments in the delivery of medical services ever--and why we in Congress should make many of those changes…
I thought the Senator from Arizona made a very commonsense proposal. We are in a position here in the Congress that we often find ourselves in: We have different opinions-- dramatically different opinions in some cases. What she said was…
The Government considers that the development covered by the Heathrow expansion NPS is critical to national growth and therefore plans to designate expansion at Heathrow as critical national growth infrastructure.





