Emma Reynolds

Thuggish and intimidating behavior

This is a concern. People have seen the images on their screens. This was very intimidating behaviour.

As a politician, I absolutely support the right to peaceful protest, but this has crossed the line. This is thuggish and intimidating behaviour.

As a general rule, we are a very open trading economy, and we believe, sort of as a general principle, that free trade is better than putting up barriers.

We have a pragmatic relationship with China, one where we cooperate on things that we agree on, but also challenge in areas where we disagree.

We've banned bonuses for polluting water bosses and will be taking action to prevent bonuses by any other name.

It's really important that we breathe life back into our high streets, but also our pubs, which are vital community assets.

It flies in the face of basic fairness, and the British public are right to be furious.

The British public are right to be furious. We've banned bonuses for polluting water bosses and will be taking action to prevent bonuses by any other name.

It's outrageous that one of the worst-performing water companies is handing out bonuses and inflation-busting pay rises to its executives.

I would like to see us use different levers of the state and use the board to really boost the level of food production in the UK.

We’ve already banned £4million in bonuses for polluting water boss and will be taking action to prevent bonuses by any other any name.

These measures will inspire healthy choices at school and home, while showing food, farming, and the countryside as an exciting, rewarding career for the next generation.

When children understand where their food comes from, lifelong healthy habits are formed – and parents having more transparency over school meals means families are put back in the picture.

I am concerned that the long-term resilience of the water and wastewater systems may not be adequately protected.

I’m not convinced about the proposal’s request to reduce performance standards.

The unfair cost to customers; delays to vital infrastructure investments; and delays to environmental improvements.

I have three particular concerns … the unfair cost to customers, delays to vital infrastructure investments, and delays to environmental improvements.

I do not believe that the current proposal goes far enough to protect customers and the environment.

Thames Water customers have been let down for far too long, with 15 years of underperformance, increasing serious pollution and customers left to pick up the bill.

I'm not convinced about the proposal's request to reduce performance standards and about the significant delay to vital infrastructure investments needed.

There is an expectation in the proposal for customers to fund and therefore bear an undue cost for investment in the company.

I do not want a scenario where Thames Water customers had to pick up the bill for the company's failures.