This mode of proceeding, by harsh laws and feeble armies, could not be defended on the principle of mercy and forbearance.
Edmund Burke: “This mode of proceeding, by harsh laws and feeble armies, could not be defended on the principle of mercy and…”
Editor's note · Context
Burke argues that harsh laws and weak enforcement cannot be justified by principles of mercy.
Share
More from Edmund Burke
Do they mean to attaint and disable backwards all the kings that have reigned before the Revolution, and consequently to stain the throne of England with the blot of a continual usurpation?
Their objects would be enlarged with their elevation; but their disposition, and habits, and mode of accomplishing their designs must remain the same.
A few years ago I should be ashamed to overload a matter so capable of supporting itself by the then unnecessary support of any argument; but this seditious, unconstitutional doctrine is now publicly taught, avowed, and printed.
But the course of succession is the healthy habit of the British Constitution.





