No: the chastity of character of a man in that situation ought to be as dear to him as his innocence.
Edmund Burke: “No: the chastity of character of a man in that situation ought to be as dear to him as his innocence.”
Editor's note · Context
Burke argues that a person's character should be as valuable to them as their innocence, especially in governance.
Share
More from Edmund Burke
Ill would our ancestors at the Revolution have deserved their fame for wisdom, if they had found no security for their freedom, but in rendering their government feeble in its operations and precarious in its tenure,--if they had been able…
The House of Lords, for instance, is not morally competent to dissolve the House of Commons,--no, nor even to dissolve itself, nor to abdicate, if it would, its portion in the legislature of the kingdom.
Do they mean to attaint and disable backwards all the kings that have reigned before the Revolution, and consequently to stain the throne of England with the blot of a continual usurpation?
But an absurd theory on one side of a question forms no justification for alleging a false fact or promulgating mischievous maxims on the other.





