Why, my Lords, he declared himself the person injured, stood forward as the accuser, assumed the office of judge, and proceeded to judgment without a party before him, without trial, without examination, without proof.
Edmund Burke: “Why, my Lords, he declared himself the person injured, stood forward as the accuser, assumed the office of judge, and…”
Editor's note · Context
Burke critiques the lack of due process in a judicial proceeding, emphasizing the importance of fair trial standards.
Share
More from Edmund Burke
A few years ago I should be ashamed to overload a matter so capable of supporting itself by the then unnecessary support of any argument; but this seditious, unconstitutional doctrine is now publicly taught, avowed, and printed.
The ceremony of cashiering kings, of which these gentlemen talk so much at their ease, can rarely, if ever, be performed without force.
A state without the means of some change is without the means of its conservation.
If kings who did not owe their crown to the choice of their people had no title to make laws, what will become of the statute De tallagio non concedendo? of the Petition of Right? of the act of Habeas Corpus?





