If you follow the train of his information, you must see, that, if these great sums were at all lent, it was not property, but spoil, that was lent; if not lent, the transaction was not a contract, but a fraud.
Edmund Burke: “If you follow the train of his information, you must see, that, if these great sums were at all lent, it was not…”
Editor's note · Context
Burke argues that if the money lent was not legitimate property, then the transaction was fraudulent.
Share
More from Edmund Burke
If all the absurd theories of lawyers and divines were to vitiate the objects in which they are conversant, we should have no law and no religion left in the world.
A few years ago I should be ashamed to overload a matter so capable of supporting itself by the then unnecessary support of any argument; but this seditious, unconstitutional doctrine is now publicly taught, avowed, and printed.
They look on the frame of their commonwealth, such as it stands, to be of inestimable value; and they conceive the undisturbed succession of the crown to be a pledge of the stability and perpetuity of all the other members of our…
Those who are servants in name, as well as in effect, do not like to be told of their situation, their duty, and their obligations.





