If the act had been legal, proper, and justifiable, he did not want our permission; he was a sovereign in his own dominions.
Edmund Burke: “If the act had been legal, proper, and justifiable, he did not want our permission; he was a sovereign in his own…”
Editor's note · Context
Burke asserts that if the Nabob's actions were legitimate, he would not require permission from others, emphasizing his authority.
Share
More from Edmund Burke
Though a king may abdicate for his own person, he cannot abdicate for the monarchy.
This idea of a liberal descent inspires us with a sense of habitual native dignity, which prevents that upstart insolence almost inevitably adhering to and disgracing those who are the first acquirers of any distinction.
But the king of Great Britain obeys no other person; all other persons are individually, and collectively too, under him, and owe to him a legal obedience.
They have little regard to the obvious consequences of their doctrine, though they may see that it leaves positive authority in very few of the positive institutions of this country.





