If it be a crime, why is it delivered into private hands to pardon without discretion, or to punish without mercy and without measure?
Edmund Burke: “If it be a crime, why is it delivered into private hands to pardon without discretion, or to punish without mercy and…”
Editor's note · Context
Burke critiques the lack of discretion in punishing insolvency, highlighting the need for mercy in justice.
Share
More from Edmund Burke
They threw a politic, well-wrought veil over every circumstance tending to weaken the rights which in the meliorated order of succession they meant to perpetuate, or which might furnish a precedent for any future departure from what they…
They look upon the legal hereditary succession of their crown as among their rights, not as among their wrongs,--as a benefit, not as a grievance,--as a security for their liberty, not as a badge of servitude.
Governments must be abused and deranged indeed, before it can be thought of; and the prospect of the future must be as bad as the experience of the past.
They have little regard to the obvious consequences of their doctrine, though they may see that it leaves positive authority in very few of the positive institutions of this country.





