If that be their object in the secession and addresses proposed, there surely never were means worse chosen to gain their end; and if this be any part of the project, it were a thousand times better it were never undertaken.
Edmund Burke: “If that be their object in the secession and addresses proposed, there surely never were means worse chosen to gain…”
Editor's note · Context
Burke critiques the proposed means of achieving a political objective, arguing that they are poorly chosen and likely to fail.
Share
More from Edmund Burke
The engagement and pact of society, which generally goes by the name of the Constitution, forbids such invasion and such surrender.
Those who are servants in name, as well as in effect, do not like to be told of their situation, their duty, and their obligations.
Do they mean to attaint and disable backwards all the kings that have reigned before the Revolution, and consequently to stain the throne of England with the blot of a continual usurpation?
The speculative line of demarcation, where obedience ought to end and resistance must begin, is faint, obscure, and not easily definable.





