You see that it was the monarchy that was precarious, not the rights of the subordinate chiefs.
Edmund Burke: “You see that it was the monarchy that was precarious, not the rights of the subordinate chiefs.”
Editor's note · Context
Burke argues that the stability of the monarchy was less certain than the established rights of local chiefs.
Share
More from Edmund Burke
Who could flatter himself that these men, suddenly, and as it were by enchantment, snatched from the humblest rank of subordination, would not be intoxicated with their unprepared greatness?
But supposing they had ranked as they ought to do, and as with us they do actually, the sides of sick-beds are not the academies for forming statesmen and legislators.
No experience has taught us that in any other course or method than that of an hereditary crown our liberties can be regularly perpetuated and preserved sacred as our hereditary right.
Always acting as if in the presence of canonized forefathers, the spirit of freedom, leading in itself to misrule and excess, is tempered with an awful gravity.





