What, Sir, would a virtuous and enlightened ministry do, on the view of the ruins of such works before them?--on the view of such a chasm of desolation as that which yawned in the midst of those countries, to the north and south, which still bore some vestiges of cultivation?
Edmund Burke: “What, Sir, would a virtuous and enlightened ministry do, on the view of the ruins of such works before them?--on the…”
Editor's note · Context
Burke questions the moral duty of a virtuous ministry in the face of destruction.
Share
More from Edmund Burke
But supposing they had ranked as they ought to do, and as with us they do actually, the sides of sick-beds are not the academies for forming statesmen and legislators.
When such an unwarrantable maxim is once established, that no throne is lawful but the elective, no one act of the princes who preceded this era of fictitious election can be valid.
Do they mean to attaint and disable backwards all the kings that have reigned before the Revolution, and consequently to stain the throne of England with the blot of a continual usurpation?
If all the absurd theories of lawyers and divines were to vitiate the objects in which they are conversant, we should have no law and no religion left in the world.





