Hastings, but they conceal the information obtained from him: a silence more damning than any positive evidence could be.
Edmund Burke: “Hastings, but they conceal the information obtained from him: a silence more damning than any positive evidence could…”
Editor's note · Context
Burke critiques the concealment of evidence in a legal case, highlighting the moral implications of such silence.
Share
More from Edmund Burke
So far is it from being true that we acquired a right by the Revolution to elect our kings, that, if we had possessed it before, the English nation did at that time most solemnly renounce and abdicate it, for themselves, and for all their…
The speculative line of demarcation, where obedience ought to end and resistance must begin, is faint, obscure, and not easily definable.
The House of Lords, for instance, is not morally competent to dissolve the House of Commons,--no, nor even to dissolve itself, nor to abdicate, if it would, its portion in the legislature of the kingdom.
But supposing they had ranked as they ought to do, and as with us they do actually, the sides of sick-beds are not the academies for forming statesmen and legislators.





