Hastings, because we could otherwise make no inquiry into his conduct, should we not be justified by his own example in insisting upon the removal of every creature of the reigning power before we could inquire into his conduct?
Edmund Burke: “Hastings, because we could otherwise make no inquiry into his conduct, should we not be justified by his own example in…”
Editor's note · Context
Burke asserts that the removal of those loyal to Hastings is essential for a fair investigation.
Share
More from Edmund Burke
A few years ago I should be ashamed to overload a matter so capable of supporting itself by the then unnecessary support of any argument; but this seditious, unconstitutional doctrine is now publicly taught, avowed, and printed.
But supposing they had ranked as they ought to do, and as with us they do actually, the sides of sick-beds are not the academies for forming statesmen and legislators.
They threw a politic, well-wrought veil over every circumstance tending to weaken the rights which in the meliorated order of succession they meant to perpetuate, or which might furnish a precedent for any future departure from what they…
Those who are servants in name, as well as in effect, do not like to be told of their situation, their duty, and their obligations.





