Amends were made for having refused small, but timely concessions, by an unlimited and untimely surrender, not only of every one of the objects of former restraints, but virtually of the whole legislative power itself which had made them.
Edmund Burke: “Amends were made for having refused small, but timely concessions, by an unlimited and untimely surrender, not only of…”
Editor's note · Context
Burke laments the consequences of refusing small concessions, leading to a larger loss of legislative power.
Share
More from Edmund Burke
An irregular, convulsive movement may be necessary to throw off an irregular, convulsive disease.
They look upon the legal hereditary succession of their crown as among their rights, not as among their wrongs,--as a benefit, not as a grievance,--as a security for their liberty, not as a badge of servitude.
Ill would our ancestors at the Revolution have deserved their fame for wisdom, if they had found no security for their freedom, but in rendering their government feeble in its operations and precarious in its tenure,--if they had been able…
If kings who did not owe their crown to the choice of their people had no title to make laws, what will become of the statute De tallagio non concedendo? of the Petition of Right? of the act of Habeas Corpus?





