If this election of a commander-in-chief be a part of the rights of men, why not of theirs?
Edmund Burke: “If this election of a commander-in-chief be a part of the rights of men, why not of theirs?”
Editor's note · Context
Burke argues for the universal rights of men to elect their leaders, emphasizing that this right should not be denied to any group.
Share
More from Edmund Burke
When such an unwarrantable maxim is once established, that no throne is lawful but the elective, no one act of the princes who preceded this era of fictitious election can be valid.
They look on the frame of their commonwealth, such as it stands, to be of inestimable value; and they conceive the undisturbed succession of the crown to be a pledge of the stability and perpetuity of all the other members of our…
Who could flatter himself that these men, suddenly, and as it were by enchantment, snatched from the humblest rank of subordination, would not be intoxicated with their unprepared greatness?





