What government is there to coerce the army but the municipality, or the municipality but the army?
Edmund Burke: “What government is there to coerce the army but the municipality, or the municipality but the army?”
Editor's note · Context
In his critique of the French Revolution, Burke poses a rhetorical question about the lack of clear authority between the army and the municipalities.
Share
More from Edmund Burke
The House of Lords, for instance, is not morally competent to dissolve the House of Commons,--no, nor even to dissolve itself, nor to abdicate, if it would, its portion in the legislature of the kingdom.
Those who are servants in name, as well as in effect, do not like to be told of their situation, their duty, and their obligations.
If kings who did not owe their crown to the choice of their people had no title to make laws, what will become of the statute De tallagio non concedendo? of the Petition of Right? of the act of Habeas Corpus?
But the course of succession is the healthy habit of the British Constitution.





