What need had they to make this declaration, if they did not know that by their doctrines and practices they had totally subverted all property?
Edmund Burke: “What need had they to make this declaration, if they did not know that by their doctrines and practices they had totally…”
Editor's note · Context
Burke questions the necessity of the Regicides' declaration in favor of property, given their past actions.
Share
More from Edmund Burke
When such an unwarrantable maxim is once established, that no throne is lawful but the elective, no one act of the princes who preceded this era of fictitious election can be valid.
If kings who did not owe their crown to the choice of their people had no title to make laws, what will become of the statute De tallagio non concedendo? of the Petition of Right? of the act of Habeas Corpus?
The ceremony of cashiering kings, of which these gentlemen talk so much at their ease, can rarely, if ever, be performed without force.
If all the absurd theories of lawyers and divines were to vitiate the objects in which they are conversant, we should have no law and no religion left in the world.





