Would not this warm language of high indignation have more of sound reason in it, more of real affection, more of true attachment, than all the lullabies of flatterers who would hush monarchs to sleep in the arms of death?
Edmund Burke: “Would not this warm language of high indignation have more of sound reason in it, more of real affection, more of true…”
Editor's note · Context
Burke argues that passionate indignation is more rational and affectionate than flattery.
Share
More from Edmund Burke
They look upon the legal hereditary succession of their crown as among their rights, not as among their wrongs,--as a benefit, not as a grievance,--as a security for their liberty, not as a badge of servitude.
They threw a politic, well-wrought veil over every circumstance tending to weaken the rights which in the meliorated order of succession they meant to perpetuate, or which might furnish a precedent for any future departure from what they…
If all the absurd theories of lawyers and divines were to vitiate the objects in which they are conversant, we should have no law and no religion left in the world.
The people of England will not ape the fashions they have never tried, nor go back to those which they have found mischievous on trial.





