If the principle of the repeal was not good, why are we not at war for a real, substantial, effective revenue?
Edmund Burke: “If the principle of the repeal was not good, why are we not at war for a real, substantial, effective revenue?”
Editor's note · Context
Burke questions the rationale behind not going to war for revenue if the repeal of the Stamp Act was unjustifiable.
Share
More from Edmund Burke
Not being illuminated with the light of which the gentlemen of France tell us they have got so abundant a share, they acted under a strong impression of the ignorance and fallibility of mankind.
I think our happy situation owing to our Constitution,--but owing to the whole of it, and not to any part singly,--owing in a great measure to what we have left standing in our several reviews and reformations, as well as to what we have…
But when the leaders choose to make themselves bidders at an auction of popularity, their talents, in the construction of the state, will be of no service.
The improvements of the National Assembly are superficial, their errors fundamental.





