Secondly, That all public estates which are more subservient to the purposes of vexing, overawing, and influencing those who hold under them, and to the expense of perception and management, than of benefit to the revenue, ought, upon every principle both of revenue and of freedom, to be disposed of.
Edmund Burke: “Secondly, That all public estates which are more subservient to the purposes of vexing, overawing, and influencing those…”
Editor's note · Context
Burke advocates for the disposal of public estates that serve more to oppress than to benefit the public revenue.
Share
More from Edmund Burke
By adhering in this manner and on those principles to our forefathers, we are guided, not by the superstition of antiquarians, but by the spirit of philosophic analogy.
Those who are servants in name, as well as in effect, do not like to be told of their situation, their duty, and their obligations.
We procure reverence to our civil institutions on the principle upon which Nature teaches us to revere individual men: on account of their age, and on account of those from whom they are descended.
The House of Lords, for instance, is not morally competent to dissolve the House of Commons,--no, nor even to dissolve itself, nor to abdicate, if it would, its portion in the legislature of the kingdom.





